In the past couple of weeks, we have observed an ongoing campaign targeting system administrators with fraudulent ads for popular system utilities. The malicious ads are displayed as sponsored results on Google’s search engine page and localized to North America.

Victims are tricked into downloading and running the Nitrogen malware masquerading as a PuTTY or FileZilla installer. Nitrogen is used by threat actors to gain initial access to private networks, followed by data theft and the deployment of ransomware such as BlackCat/ALPHV.

We have reported this campaign to Google but no action has been taken yet. This blog post aims to share the tactics, techniques and procedures (TTPs) as well as indicators of compromise (IOCs) so defenders can take action.

Step 1: Luring victims in via malicious ads

The initial intrusion starts from a malicious ad displayed via Google search. We have observed several different advertiser accounts which were all reported to Google. The lures are utilities commonly used by IT admins such as PuTTY and FileZilla.

Online ads from search engine result pages are increasingly being used to deliver malware to corporate users. ThreatDown users that have DNS Filtering can enable ad blocking in their console to prevent such malvertising attacks:

Step 2: Directing users to lookalike sites

The malvertising infrastructure deployed by Nitrogen threat actors uses a cloaking page that can either redirect to a decoy site or the infamous Rick Astley video. The redirect to a decoy page can be activated if the campaign is not weaponized yet or if the malicious server detects invalid traffic (bot, crawler, etc.).

The Rick Astley redirect is mostly to mock security researchers investigating this campaign:

Actual lookalike pages are meant for potential victims. They are often good-looking copycats which could easily fool just about anyone:

ThreatDown blocks these malicious websites to prevent your users from being social-engineered into downloading malware:

Step 3: Deploying malware via a fraudulent installer

The final step in this malvertising chain consists of downloading and running the malware payload. Nitrogen uses a technique known as DLL sideloading whereby a legitimate and signed executable launches a DLL. In this case, setup.exe (from the Python Software Foundation) sideloads python311.dll (Nitrogen).

ThreatDown via its EDR engine quarantines the malicious DLL immediately. System administrators can log into their console and use the AI-assisted engine to quickly search and review the detection:

Recommendations

While there are many phishing training simulations for email threats, we aren’t aware of similar trainings for malvertising. Yet, the threat has become prevalent enough to warrant better user education.

Endpoints can be protected from malicious ads via group policies that restrict traffic coming from the main and lesser known ad networks. Click here for more information about DNS filtering via our Nebula platform.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is a cornerstone in your security posture, complemented by Managed Detection and Response (MDR) where analysts can quickly alert you of an impending intrusion.

Indicators of Compromise

Cloaking domains:

kunalicon[.]com
inzerille[.]com
recovernj[.]com

Lookalike sites:

file-zilla-projectt[.]org
puuty[.]org
pputy[.]com
puttyy[.]ca

Nitrogen payloads (URLs):

amplex-amplification[.]com/wp-includes/FileZilla_3.66.1_win64.zip
newarticles23[.]com/wp-includes/putty-64bit-0.80-installer.zip
support[.]hosting-hero[.]com/wp-includes/putty-64bit-0.80-installer.zip
mkt.geostrategy-ec[.]com/installer.zip

Nitrogen payloads (SHA256):

ecde4ca1588223d08b4fc314d6cf4bce82989f6f6a079e3eefe8533222da6281
2037ec95c91731f387d3c0c908db95184c93c3b8412b6b3ca3219f9f8ff60945
033a286218baca97da19810446f9ebbaf33be6549a5c260889d359e2062778cf

Nitrogen C2s:

94.156.65[.]98
94.156.65[.]115

Most of the malicious search ads we have seen have originated from Google, but threat actors are also abusing other search engines. Microsoft Bing is probably the second best target due to its close ties to the Windows ecosystem and Edge browser.

In this blog post, we look at a very recent malvertising campaign impersonating the popular VPN software NordVPN. A malicious advertiser is capturing traffic from Bing searches and redirecting users to a decoy site that looks almost identical to the real one.

The threat actors went ever further by trying to digitally sign a malicious installer as if they were the official vendor. Victims will have the impression they are getting NordVPN as it is part of the package, but will also inadvertently install a Remote Access Trojan known as SecTopRAT on their computer.

We have reported the malicious Bing ad to Microsoft, and other parts of the distribution infrastructure to their respective provider. We want to reiterate that NordVPN is a legitimate VPN provider and they are being impersonated by threat actors.

Fraudulent Bing ad

When searching for “nord vpn” via the Bing search engine, we identified a malicious ad that impersonates NordVPN. The ad itself looks suspicious because of the URL in the ad snippet. The domain name nordivpn[.]xyz was created one day ago (April 3, 2024). It was probably chosen as it looks quite similar to the official name and can deceive users who aren’t looking too closely.

As we often see, the ad URL is simply used as a redirection mechanism to a fake website that is meant to look identical to the one being impersonated. This is true here as well, where we have a redirect to besthord-vpn[.]com (note again the spelling chosen with the ‘h‘ looking like an ‘n‘) which was created today, only a few hours ago.

The website looks incredibly convincing, and victims will be tricked into downloading the app from there. Unlike the legitimate NordVPN that goes through a sign up process, here you can directly download the installer from Dropbox.

Here’s a summary of the traffic flow from the malicious ad to the download link:

Malware payload

The downloaded file is called NordVPNSetup.exe and is digitally signed, as if it was from its official vendor; however, the signature is not valid.

The file contains both an installer for NordVPN and a malware payload. The installer for NordVPN is meant to give victims the illusion that they are actually installing a real file.

The payload is injected into MSBuild.exe and will connect to the malware author’s command and control server at 45.141.87[.]216 on port 15647.

That network traffic is detected by Emerging Threats as Arechclient2 Backdoor, an alias for SecTopRAT.

Conclusion

Malvertising continues to show how easy it is to surreptitiously install malware under the guise of popular software downloads. Threat actors are able to roll out infrastructure quickly and easily to bypass many content filters.

ThreatDown customers who have DNS Filtering can proactively block online ads by enabling the rule for advertisements. This is a simple, and yet powerful way to prevent malvertising across an entire organization or in specific areas.

The malicious ad and related indictors have been reported as we work with industry partners to take down this campaign. Dropbox has already taken action to take down the malicious download.

Indicators of Compromise

Malicious domains

nordivpn[.]xyz
besthord-vpn[.]com

Fake NordVPN installer

e9131d9413f1596b47e86e88dc5b4e4cc70a0a4ec2d39aa8f5a1a5698055adfc

SecTopRAT C2

45.141.87[.]216

Educational institutions may face a range of cyberthreats in 2024, but our 2024 State of Malware in Education report identifies the six most critical ones.

Ransomware, for example, stands out as a key threat for schools and universities. The report covers how last year, we witnessed a 92% increase in ransomware attacks in K-12 schools and a 70% increase in Higher Education. The trend appears set to continue, partly due to specialized ransomware groups like Rhysida (formerly Vice Society) targeting educational sectors.  

Another major threat our 2024 State of Malware in Education covers is the reduction of conventional malware in favor of Living off The Land (LOTL) attacks. LOTL attacks exploit legitimate system tools to remain undetected while conducting harmful activities.

Our report suggests that educational institutions must employ expert staff to manually identify LOTL activities, which traditional malware detection tools miss. For example, we recently wrote how one K-12 district used MDR to uncover malicious PowerShell activity and stop an ongoing infection.

Some other trends and threats educational institutions can expect in the report to cover include:

• Why targeting Macs has become an easy choice for criminals 
• How CL0P is rewriting the ransomware playbook and why Big Game ransomware remains the most serious threat.
• How cybercriminals use ‘malvertising’ to target educational institutions with malicious ads for popular for remote learning such as Zoom. 

As we progress into 2024, the reality is that educational institutions’ success in pairing state of the art security software with skilled security staff will be a deciding factor in their ability to take down the most serious cyberthreats. 

To understand the complete list of threats facing educational institutions in 2024 and how to tackle them, get the full 2024 State of Malware in Education report—tailored to either K-12 or Higher Ed—below.

---

In early 2024, a large K-12 school district partnered with ThreatDown MDR to strengthen its cybersecurity posture. Shortly after onboarding, ThreatDown MDR analysts detected unusual patterns of activity subsequently identified as the work of SolarMarker, a sophisticated backdoor. It became evident that SolarMarker had been present in the district’s system since at least 2021, likely exfiltrating data over several years.

Let’s dive further into the investigation’s findings and the steps taken to mitigate the threat.

SolarMarker infection

Background

The incident began with the detection of an anomalous instance of PowerShell attempting to establish an outbound network connection to a suspicious IP address (188.241.83.61). This connection attempt was thwarted by Malwarebytes Web Protection (MWAC), signaling the first indication of a potential security breach.

Initial challenges

Upon investigation, it was discovered that Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) settings were disabled in the client’s endpoint policy. This limitation prevented the use of Fast Response Scanning (FRS) to capture and analyze detailed endpoint data, necessitating a manual approach to the investigation utilizing Active Response Scanning (ARS).

Investigation and analysis

The first step involved querying active network connections with netstat, which revealed an instance of PowerShell in operation. To further understand the nature of this PowerShell instance, its command line was examined using Windows Management Instrumentation Command-line (WMIC) with the process ID (PID), which unveiled obfuscated code.

Decoding and understanding SolarMarker

The obfuscated PowerShell code was extracted and refactored for clarity. The analysis revealed the following components of the malware’s operation:

powershell

$decodeKey = '<Base64_encoded_string>'

$encodedFilePath = 'C:\Users\akeith\AppData\Roaming\micROSoft\wbpgVnSBjsytaokm\JqdVQplHfgwxyNmtaPX.gvzPlATqFe'

$decodedPayload = [System.IO.File]::ReadAllBytes($encodedFilePath)

for ($payloadIndex = 0; $payloadIndex -lt $decodedPayload.Count; $payloadIndex++) {

 $decodedPayload[$payloadIndex] = $decodedPayload[$payloadIndex] -bxor $decodeKey[$payloadIndex % $decodeKey.Length]

 if ($payloadIndex -ge $decodeKey.Length) {

 $payloadIndex = $decodeKey.Length

 }

}

[System.Reflection.Assembly]::Load($decodedPayload)

[ab821408b424418fa94bb4d815b4e.ad0682a943e4859ef35309cc0a537]::a1f5abfa214411baa77e25f6ceaa6()

This code reveals the malware’s methodology:

• It utilizes a Base64-encoded string as a decryption key.
• It targets a specific file path for encoded data.
• It reads, decodes, and executes the encrypted payload.

The command line shows signs of the malicious script execution, with parameters indicative of a desire to hide the window (-WindowStyle Hidden), bypass execution policies (-Ep ByPass), and run encoded commands (-ComMand “sa43…). 

Further investigation uncovered randomly named folders within the AppData\Roaming\Microsoft directory, each containing encoded payloads. These discoveries suggested a more widespread infection than initially anticipated.

Response and mitigation

The response involved several steps to contain and eliminate the threat:

• Terminating the malicious PowerShell instance.
• Deleting the identified folders containing encoded payloads.
• Conducting a thorough search for persistence mechanisms, which fortunately yielded no findings.

A comprehensive threat scan was executed, and the incident was escalated for visibility with the client. Post-reboot checks confirmed the absence of persistence, no spawn of new PowerShell instances, and blocking of suspicious network connections, indicating successful remediation of the infection.

Conclusion

As we’ve seen in our 2024 State of Ransomware in Education report, the educational sector continues to be a prime target for attackers. In this case, attackers used SolarMarker, a sophisticated backdoor, to lurk within the school district’s network for years, likely stealing data in the process. Its presence went undetected until the district onboarded with ThreatDown MDR. Despite facing initial obstacles, such as disabled EDR settings, the ThreatDown MDR team successfully identified and neutralized the SolarMarker infection through manual intervention.

Discover how ThreatDown MDR can safeguard your K-12 institution.

Malware loaders (also known as droppers or downloaders) are a popular commodity in the criminal underground. Their primary function is to successfully compromise a machine and deploy one or multiple additional payloads.

A good loader avoids detection and identifies victims as legitimate (i.e. not sandboxes) before pushing other malware. This part is quite critical as the value of a loader is directly tied to the satisfaction of its “customers”.

In this blog post, we describe a malvertising campaign with a loader that was new to us. The program is written in the Go language and uses an interesting technique to deploy its follow-up payload, the Rhadamanthys stealer.

Malicious ad targets system administrators

PuTTY is a very popular SSH and Telnet client for Windows that has been used by IT admins for years. The threat actor bought an ad that claims to be the PuTTY homepage and appeared at the top of the Google search results page, right before the official website.

In this example, the ad looks suspicious simply because the ad snippet shows a domain name (arnaudpairoto[.]com) that is completely unrelated. This is not always the case, and we continue to see many malicious ads that exactly match the impersonated brand.

Fake PuTTY site

The ad URL points to the attacker controlled domain where they can easily defeat security checks by showing a “legitimate” page to visitors that are not real victims. For example, a crawler, sandbox or scanner, will see this half finished blog:

Real victims coming from the US will be redirected to a fake site instead that looks and feels exactly like putty.org. One of the big differences though is the download link.

The malicious payload is downloaded via a 2 step redirection chain which is something we don’t always see.

puttyconnect[.]info/1.php
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Location: astrosphere[.]world/onserver3.php

astrosphere[.]world/onserver3.php
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: nginx/1.24.0
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Content-Length: 13198274
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Description: File Transfer
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="PuTTy.exe"

We believe the astrosphere[.]world server is performing some checks for proxies while also logging the victim’s IP address. This IP address will later be checked before downloading the secondary payload.

That PuTTy.exe is malware, a dropper written in the Go language (version 1.21.0).

Its author may have given it the name “Dropper 1.3“:

Follow-up payload

Upon executing the dropper, there is an IP check for the victim’s public IP address. This is likely done to only continue with users that have gone through the malicious ad and downloaded the malware from the fake site.

zodiacrealm[.]info/api.php?action=check_ip&ip=[IP Address]

If a match is found, the dropper proceeds to retrieve a follow-up payload from another server (192.121.16[.]228:22) as seen in the image below:

To get this data, we see it uses the SSHv2 (Secure Shell 2.0) protocol implemented via OpenSSH on a Ubuntu server. We can only think of using this protocol to make the malware download more covert.

That payload is Rhadamanthys which is executed by the parent process PuTTy.exe:

Malvertising / loader combo

We have seen different types of loaders via malvertising campaigns, including FakeBat which we profiled recently. Given how closely the loader is tied to the malvertising infrastructure it is quite likely that the same threat actor is controlling both. The service they offer to other criminals is one of malware delivery where they take care of the entire deployment process, from ad to loader to final payload.

We reported this campaign to Google. Malwarebytes and ThreatDown users are protected as we detect the fake PuTTY installer as Trojan.Script.GO.

ThreatDown users that have DNS Filtering can enable ad blocking in their console to prevent attacks that originate from malicious ads.

Indicators of Compromise

Decoy ad domain

arnaudpairoto[.]com

Fake site

puttyconnect[.]info

PuTTY

astrosphere[.]world
0caa772186814dbf84856293f102c7538980bcd31b70c1836be236e9fa05c48d

IP check

zodiacrealm[.]info

Rhadamanthys

192.121.16[.]228:22
bea1d58d168b267c27b1028b47bd6ad19e249630abb7c03cfffede8568749203

February was a particularly busy month for search-based malvertising with the number of incidents we documented almost doubling. We saw similar payloads being dropped but also a few new ones that were particularly good at evading detection.

One malware family we have been tracking on this blog is FakeBat. It is very unique in that the threat actor uses MSIX installers packaged with heavily obfuscated PowerShell code. For weeks, the malvertiser helping to distribute this malware was abusing the same URL shortener services which may have made the attack somewhat predictable. We saw them experimenting with new redirectors and in particular leveraging legitimate websites to bypass security checks.

Another interesting aspect is the diversity of the latest campaigns. For a while, we saw the same software brands (Parsec, Freecad) being impersonated over and over again. With this latest wave of FakeBat malvertising, we are seeing many different brands being targeted.

All the incidents described in this blog have been reported to Google.

New redirection chain

During the past several weeks, FakeBat malvertising campaigns used two kinds of ad URLs. As observed in other malvertising campaigns, they were abusing URL/analytics shorteners which are ideal for cloaking. That practice enables a threat actor to use a ‘good’ or ‘bad’ destination URL based on their own defined parameters (time of day, IP address, user-agent, etc.).

The other type of redirect was using subdomains from expired and sitting .com domains reassigned for malicious purposes. This is a common trick to give the illusion of credibility. However, in the most recent malvertising campaigns we see the threat actor abusing legitimate websites that appear to have been compromised.

It’s worth noting that the few examples we found were all Argentinian-based (.ar TLD):

Victims click on the ad which sends a request to those hacked sites. Because the request contains the Google referer, the threat actor is able to serve a conditional redirect to their own malicious site:

The full infection chain can be summarized in the web traffic image seen below:

Several active brand impersonations

There are currently several campaigns running including OneNote, Epic Games, Ginger and even the Braavos smart wallet application. A number of those malicious domains can be found on Russian-based hoster DataLine (78.24.180[.]93).

Each downloaded file is an MSIX installer signed with a valid digital certificate (Consoneai Ltd).

Once extracted, each installer contains more or less the same files with a particular PowerShell script:

When the installer is ran, this PowerShell script will execute and connect to the attacker’s command and control server. Victims of interest will be cataloged for further use. ThreatDown EDR detects the PowerShell execution and creates an alert:

Conclusion

FakeBat continues to be a threat to businesses via malicious ads for popular software downloads. The malware distributors are able to bypass Google’s security checks and redirect victims to deceiving websites.

It is as important to defend against the supporting infrastructure as the malware payloads. However, that is not always easy since legitimate websites may be used to defeat domain blocklists. As always, blocking ads at the source via system policies such as ThreatDown DNS Filter, remains one the most effective ways to stop malvertising attacks in their tracks.

Indicators of Compromise

Hacked sites

cecar[.]com[.]ar
estiloplus[.]tur[.]ar
disenoymas[.]com[.]ar
barcala[.]com[.]ar
elchubutense[.]com[.]ar
argentec[.]com[.]ar
culturabritanicacba[.]org[.]ar
starfirematafuegos[.]com[.]ar
tecnologiaag[.]com[.]ar
anelli[.]com[.]ar

Decoy sites

obs-software[.]cc
bandi-cam[.]cc
breavas[.]app
open-project[.]org
onenote-download[.]com
epicgames-store[.]org
blcnder[.]org
trelconf[.]com
trelconf[.]net
noitons[.]net

Download URLs

bezynet[.]com/OBS-Studio-30[.]0[.]2-Full-Installer-x64[.]msix
bezynet[.]com/Bandicam_7[.]21_win64[.]msix
church-notes[.]com/Braavos-Wallet[.]msix
church-notes[.]com/Epic-Games_Setup[.]msix
church-notes[.]com/Onenote_setup[.]msix
avr-energie[.]com/Trello-Full-Installer-x64.msix
avr-energie.com/Notion%20Setup%203.2.1.msix

File hashes

07b0c5e7d77629d050d256fa270d21a152b6ef8409f08ecc47899253aff78029
0d906e43ddf453fd55c56ccd6132363ef4d66e809d5d8a38edea7622482c1a7a
15ce7b4e6decad4b78fe6727d97692a8f5fd13d808da18cb9d4ce51801498ad8
40c9b735d720eeb83c85aae8afe0cc136dd4a4ce770022a221f85164a5ff14e5
f7fbf33708b385d27469d925ca1b6c93b2c2ef680bc4096657a1f9a30e4b5d18
d6a6b73c273c508417898c02a142c496158ad2d0432495bff3a4f94f574d5bc4
b2e8277064af7791a3a73479ff2f2c45be3591c96567addb9421faed3dc7e2be

Command and control servers

62.204.41[.]98
ads-pill[.]xyz
ads-pill[.]top
ads-tooth[.]top
ads-tooth[.]xyz
ads-analyze[.]top
ads-analyze[.]xyz
ads-analyze[.]site
ads-eagle[.]xyz
ads-eagle[.]top
ads-hoop[.]top
ads-hoop[.]xyz
ads-creep[.]xyz
ads-creep[.]top
ads-moon[.]top
ads-moon[.]xyz
ads-work[.]top
ads-work[.]site
ads-work[.]xyz
ads-star[.]top
ads-star[.]xyz
ads-star[.]online
ads-star[.]site
ads-strong[.]site
ads-strong[.]online
ads-strong[.]top
ads-strong[.]xyz
ads-change[.]online
ads-change[.]top
ads-change[.]xyz
ads-change[.]site

This article is based on research by Marcelo Rivero, Malwarebytes’ ransomware specialist, who monitors information published by ransomware gangs on their Dark Web sites. In this report, “known attacks” are those where the victim did not pay a ransom. This provides the best overall picture of ransomware activity, but the true number of attacks is far higher.

In February, there were 376 ransomware victims, marking an unusually active month for the historically subdued time period. But February didn’t just bring unprecedented numbers, but unprecedented developments as well: law enforcement shut down LockBit, the largest ransomware gang, while ALPHV, the second-largest, appeared to fake its demise and abscond with its own affiliates’ funds.

Before we dive into the two biggest stories of the month, however, let’s start with a quick overview of other significant ransomware developments, including a new Coveware report revealing a record low of 29% of victims paying ransoms in the last quarter of 2023.

A few years ago, paying ransomware attackers was almost a given—85% of hit organizations in early 2019 felt they had no choice. But fast forward to 2024, and Coveware data suggests that that trend has completely reversed—not only have the number of victims paying dropped but so have the dollar amounts of actual ransom payments. In other words, we’re seeing fewer and smaller ransomware payouts than ever before. 

At first glance, the trend appears counterintuitive: with global ransomware attacks hitting record highs annually, one might expect a proportional increase in the number of victims choosing to pay a ransom. But as it turns out, all the attention on ransomware is effectively shooting attackers in the foot: the more these attacks make headlines, the more businesses understand ransomware as a prime threat, leading to improved security measures that can allow victims to recover from an attack without paying a ransom. Also discouraging payments are increasing doubts about cybercriminals’ reliability and stricter anti-ransom laws.

But all of this begs the question: with fewer payments, will ransomware gangs adapt their strategies to remain a threat, or will the decrease in successful ransoms lead to a decline in attacks as they seek more lucrative avenues? Will ransomware attacks always remain profitable, albeit less so over time? The report raises just about as many questions as it answers. 

Our prediction? Ransomware gangs aren’t backing down any time soon; in fact, they’ll likely continue getting more inventive in pressuring companies to pay up. Our coverage on “big game ransomware” showed ransomware gangs aren’t just hiking up demands when companies resist paying, they’re also turning to more aggressive tactics. “Threats to leak data, sell it online, break other parts of the business, attack related firms, or even harass employees are all tactics gangs can make use of” to force reluctant businesses to pay, writes former Malwarebytes Labs author Christopher Boyd.

In other words, despite fewer companies paying up, we foresee ransomware attackers compensating with higher ransom demands and more sophisticated, aggressive negotiation tactics.

In other February news, new reports highlighted ALPHV’s surge of targeted attacks against the healthcare sector. Coincidentally, a day after these reports were published, there was news of ALPHV’s severe attack on Change Healthcare, one of the largest healthcare technology companies in the US.

The report indicated that since mid-December 2023, out of nearly 70 leaked victims, the healthcare sector has been ALPHV’s most frequent target. This seems to be a response to the ALPHV Blackcat administrator’s encouragement for its affiliates to target hospitals following actions against the group and its infrastructure in early December 2023.

The Roman historian Tacitus once said, “Crime, once exposed, has no refuge but in audacity.” Well, the exposure of ALPHV’s crimes has seemingly emboldened them further, pushing them to undertake even more brazen acts of revenge against the very institutions aiming to curb their criminal activities. At the end of the day, ALPHV’s actions are unsurprisingly petty, pointless, and endanger human lives, but they at the very least they hint at the group’s last desperate gasps for relevance.

On the vulnerability front, ransomware gangs like Black Basta, Bl00dy, and LockBit were seen exploiting vulnerabilities in ConnectWise ScreenConnect last month that exposed servers to control by attackers. It appears that almost every other month, our ransomware reviews uncover a new vulnerability being exploited with great success—whether it was MOVEit in the summer of 2023 or Citrix Bleed at the end of 2023. The vulnerabilities in ScreenConnect are once again part of this broader trend we’ve noticed of ransomware gangs finding ever-new points of entry—perhaps even more quickly and extensively than in previous years.

LockBit down, ALPHV out

February 2024 is likely to be remembered for years as the month when two of the most dangerous ransomware gangs in the world suffered some serious turbulence.

LockBit has been the preeminent ransomware menace since the demise of Conti in spring 2022, but for the first time there are serious reasons to doubt its status and longevity. On February 19, the ransomware gang’s dark web site announced “This site is now under the control of The National Crime Agency of the UK, working in close cooperation with the FBI and the international law enforcement task force, ‘Operation Cronos’.”

What followed was something quite unique in the annals of ransomware takedowns. Alongside the usual dry press releases, the law enforcement agencies responsible used the site it had acquired to showcase the details of what it had done.

It was an act of exquisite trolling that looked designed to damage the LockBit brand by humiliating it in the eyes of its peers and affiliates.

There was substance to the disruption too—some arrests, “a vast amount of intelligence” gathered, infrastructure seized, cryptocurrency accounts frozen, decryption keys captured, and the revelation that LockBit administrator LockBitSupp “has engaged with law enforcement.”

LockBit quickly established a new site and insisted everything was fine in exactly the way that people do when things aren’t fine, by releasing a stream of concious 3,000-word essay that explained precisely how fine things were, thanks. It remains to be seen if LockBit’s rebound will last. When ransomware gangs start to feel the hot breath of law enforcement on their neck a rebrand normally follows.

LockBit’s main rival, ALPHV, used February to demonstrate an alternative ending. It decided to leave the ransomware world behind by ripping off its own customers (which are really just affiliates in crime) in a sloppily executed exit scam. ALPHV had suffered its own brush with law enforcement in December and, like LockBit, appeared to have recovered.

Perhaps it was spooked by its brush with the feds, or perhaps the $22 million ransom an affiliate extracted from its devastating attack on Change Healthcare was just too hard to resist. Whatever the reason, ALPHV cut and ran, taking the cash and leaving its criminal affiliates high and dry. A half-hearted attempt to pin the blame for its disappearance on the FBI fooled no one.

Preventing Ransomware

Fighting off ransomware gangs like the ones we report on each month requires a layered security strategy. Technology that preemptively keeps gangs out of your systems is great—but it’s not enough. 

Ransomware attackers target the easiest entry points: an example chain might be that they first try phishing emails, then open RDP ports, and if those are secured, they’ll exploit unpatched vulnerabilities. Multi-layered security is about making infiltration progressively harder and detecting those who do get through. 

Technologies like Endpoint Protection (EP) and Vulnerability and Patch Management (VPM) are vital first defenses, reducing breach likelihood. 

The key point, though, is to assume that motivated gangs will eventually breach defenses. Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is crucial for finding and removing threats before damage occurs. And if a breach does happen—ransomware rollback tools can undo changes.

How ThreatDown Addresses Ransomware

ThreatDown bundles take a comprehensive approach to these challenges. Our integrated solutions combine EP, VPM, and EDR technologies, tailored to your organization’s specific needs. ThreatDown’s select bundles offer:

• Advanced Web Protection: Blocking phishing websites ransomware gangs use for initial access.
• RDP Shield: Securing remote access points with Brute Force Protection.
• Continuous Vulnerability Scanning and Patch Management: Identifying and patching weaknesses before ransomware gangs can exploit them.
• Sophisticated EDR: Detecting and neutralizing advanced threats such as LockBit within the network.
• Ransomware Rollback: Reversing the impact of any successful attacks.

ThreatDown EDR detecting LockBit ransomware

ThreatDown automatically quarantining LockBit ransomware

For resource-constrained organizations, select ThreatDown bundles offer Managed Detection and Response (MDR) services, providing expert monitoring and swift threat response to ransomware threats—without the need for large in-house cybersecurity teams.

---

Our business solutions remove all remnants of ransomware and prevent you from getting reinfected. Want to learn more about how we can help protect your business? Get a free trial below.