❌

Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Before yesterdayMain stream

CISA Releases Guide on Modern Approaches to Network Access Security

By: Alan J
19 June 2024 at 16:15

CISA Network Access Security

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has identified numerous vulnerabilities in traditional virtual private network (VPN) solutions that have been exploited in recent high-profile cyber attacks, leading the agency to recommend that organizations adopt new approaches to network access security. CISA has urged businesses to switch to modern approaches like Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) and Secure Service Edge (SSE) to integrate enhanced identity verification, adaptive access controls, and cloud-delivered security. This move would help advance their way on their zero trust journey.

Vulnerabilities in Traditional VPN Systems

CISA has identified several different vulnerabilities in legacy VPN systems can enable broad network compromise if exploited, given their typical lack of granular access controls. While VPNs provide ease of access for employees to connect to remote company applications and external data servers, they also make organizations more susceptible to compromise through various vulnerabilities inherent to typical network design. Recent examples of successful exploitation of VPNs include:
  • Vulnerabilities affecting Ivanti Connect Secure gateways (CVE-2023-46805, CVE-2024-21887, and CVE-2024-21893) allowed threat actors to reverse tunnel from the VPN device, hijack sessions, and move laterally across victim networks while evading detection.
  • The Citrix Bleed vulnerability (CVE-2023-4966) enabled bypassing of multifactor authentication, allowing threat actors to impersonate legitimate users, harvest credentials, and conduct ransomware attacks.
Compromised user devices connected via VPNs also introduce risks from poor cyber hygiene. And third-party vendors granted VPN access may lack sufficient network segmentation controls and least privilege protections. While some VPNs can enforce firewall policies, not all provide the identity-based adaptive access controls central to zero trust. Software-based VPNs also carry inherent vulnerabilities lacking in hardware-based solutions.

Modern Solutions to Network Access Security

Modern alternatives to VPN-based network access control includes zero trust architecture, SSE, SASE and identity-based adaptive access policies. These solutions provide access to applications and services based on continuous, granular validation of user identity and authorization - rejecting those not explicitly authenticated for specific resources. Zero Trust is a collection of different concepts and ideas that help organizations enforce accurate per-request access decisions based on the principles of least privilege. SSE is a comprehensive approach that combines networking, security practices, policies and services within a single platform. Key capabilities like multi-factor authentication, endpoint security validation, and activity monitoring better secure data in network transit while reducing attack surfaces. Tighter access controls also help secure data at rest by limiting exposure of internal applications. Effectiveness relies heavily on aligning network and infrastructure with zero trust principles like least privilege. Implementing zero trust even partially can greatly enhance protections against threats and data loss. Media Disclaimer: This report is based on internal and external research obtained through various means. The information provided is for reference purposes only, and users bear full responsibility for their reliance on it. The Cyber Express assumes no liability for the accuracy or consequences of using this information.

China state hackers infected 20,000 Fortinet VPNs, Dutch spy service says

11 June 2024 at 18:56
China state hackers infected 20,000 Fortinet VPNs, Dutch spy service says

Enlarge

Hackers working for the Chinese government gained access to more than 20,000 VPN appliances sold by Fortinet using a critical vulnerability that the company failed to disclose for two weeks after fixing it, Netherlands government officials said.

The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2022-42475, is a heap-based buffer overflow that allows hackers to remotely execute malicious code. It carries a severity rating of 9.8 out of 10. A maker of network security software, Fortinet silently fixed the vulnerability on November 28, 2022, but failed to mention the threat until December 12 of that year, when the company said it became aware of an β€œinstance where this vulnerability was exploited in the wild.” On January 11, 2023β€”more than six weeks after the vulnerability was fixedβ€”Fortinet warned a threat actor was exploiting it to infect government and government-related organizations with advanced custom-made malware.

Enter CoatHanger

The Netherlands officials first reported in February that Chinese state hackers had exploited CVE-2022-42475 to install an advanced and stealthy backdoor tracked as CoatHanger on Fortigate appliances inside the Dutch Ministry of Defense. Once installed, the never-before-seen malware, specifically designed for the underlying FortiOS operating system, was able to permanently reside on devices even when rebooted or receiving a firmware update. CoatHanger could also escape traditional detection measures, the officials warned. The damage resulting from the breach was limited, however, because infections were contained inside a segment reserved for non-classified uses.

Read 6 remaining paragraphs | Comments

❌
❌